Oceans Alive 2 is a unique super-nutrient from the ocean provides the body with an increase in residual energy that builds up significantly when it is ingested on a daily basis. With its abundance of naturally produced vitamins, minerals and original life force (absorbed directly from the Sun), everyone that partakes will enjoy a whole body inner strength.
A team of European doctors, microbiologists and botanists spent many years and millions of dollars researching 40,000 species of marine phytoplankton in the ocean. They did this, to determine the best species in each category to use for biofuel, aquaculture, exotic fish food and ultimately human consumption. Only four species of Marine Phytoplankton were found to be beneficial for human consumption. Based on nutritional profiles, one species was super beneficial and chosen for production.
As a result of this extensive research, technologically advanced commercial facilities have now been developed and constructed to produce raw marine phytoplankton in large volumes using sophisticated bio-reactors. The bio-reactors consist of extensive glass tubing interconnected in a horizontal grid the size of a football field. A 'Spring Bloom' environment is created that, allows natural photosynthesis to occur using, sunlight to grow the live marine phytoplankton bio-mass. The purified sea water solution in which the live marine phytoplankton grows, ensures that there are no other species contaminating the biomass. This method produces an absolutely pure, super concentrated nutrient.
Once the biomass reaches maturity, it is then harvested into a powerful centrifuge that spins the water out from around the cells but, leaves the water within the cells protecting the valuable life energy. The centrifuged biomass has the consistency of thick peanut butter. To create the Ocean's Alive liquid nutrient combination, the live raw marine phytoplankton biomass is transferred from the centrifuge and immediately blended into an ocean derived concentrated ionic trace mineral solution. This concentrated solution is highly beneficial to human health as it contains more than 90 ionic and trace minerals. Its produced using a natural evaporation process employing the sun and the wind which eliminates 93% of the sodium.
This purified ocean water concentrate has the power to preserve the raw live marine phytoplankton in suspended animation. This, protects the original life energy, allowing it to be bottled and stored at room temperature with no deterioration. The live blend is finally potentized energetically with its own frequency to maximize the nutritional life force!
The intense raw chlorophyll content in Ocean's Alive also increases oxygen uptake and higher oxygen uptake means more fuel to muscles, which translates to improved performance and endurance. With the smallest nano-particulate size of all microalgae, Oceans Alive delivers vital life energy at the DNA/Mitochondria level and also penetrates the blood/brain barrier feeding the higher master glands located deep in the brain stimulating significant mental clarity.
People that experience Oceans Alive are known to possibly enjoy enhanced brain function, improved immune function, antiviral/antifungal/antibacterial effects, improved cellular repair, radiation protection, cancer protection, detoxification support, anti-inflammatory support, antioxidant support, improved circulation, improved heart function and allergy/asthma relief. There are hundreds of references in text books detailing the vast array of human health benefits gained through the consumption of live raw marine phytoplankton.
Ocean's Alive Live Liquid Marine Phytoplankton is an original, live, whole, concentrated raw food requiring no refrigeration and comes packaged in 1 oz. cobalt blue glass bottles with droppers for easy dispensing.
Some possible traditional uses of Raw Liquid Marine Phytoplankton 2 may include:
● Excellent source of raw chlorophyll
● A gentle yet powerful energy that builds residually day by day
● Aids in whole body homeostasis
● May Assist to regulate blood sugar naturally
● Encourages vibrant & healthy looking skin
● Supports healthy eyesight & increased strength
● Calms the mind & body & enhances meditation
● May Speed the recovery from illness & disease
● May Reduce symptoms of heartburn
● May Improve memory
● Instant trace mineral gratification with 92 macro & trace minerals
● Assists in strengthening the immune, nervous, & endocrine systems
● Antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial
● May Help defend against radiation
● Powerful anti-inflammatory & antioxidant qualities
● May Improve circulation & heart function
● May Protect against asthma & allergies
● Contains essential fatty acids - Omega 3, 6, 7, 9
One Month Supply (30 days): 1 oz contains 10.5 g (10,500 mg) of Pure Whole Live Marine Phytoplankton Providing 350 mg per daily serving of 15 drops (1 ml). Ocean's Alive delivers 350 mg per day of Super-Charged Pure Live Marine Phytoplankton with Zero Fillers or additives!
Suggested Use: 15 drops daily.
Botanical Name: Nannochloropsis Gaditana
Other Names: microalgae, phytoplankton
Ingredients: 'Heirloom multi-strain' marine phytoplankton (raw, fresh harvest stabilized) suspended in pure, concentrated sea mineral solution.
Z Natural Foods strives to offer the highest quality organically grown, raw, vegan, gluten free, non-GMO products available and exclusively uses low temperature drying techniques to preserve all the vital enzymes and nutrients.
1. Anderson, D. M. 1994. Red tides. Scientific American 271(2):62-68.
2. Burkholder, J. M., E. J. Noga, C. W. Hobbs, H. B. Glasgow, Jr., and S. A. Smith. 1992. New 'phantom' dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills. Nature 358:407-410.
3. Burkholder, J. M., H. B. Glasgow, Jr., and C. W. Hobbs. 1995. Fish kills linked to a toxic ambush-predator dinoflagellate: distribution and environmental conditions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 124:43-61.
4. Camburn, K. E., R. L. Lowe, and D. L. Stoneburner. 1978. The haptobenthic diatom flora of Longbranch Creek, South Carolina. Nova Hedwigia, Band 30:149-279.
5. Dardeau, M. R., R. F. Modein, W. W. Schroeder, and J. J. Stout. 1992. Estuaries. p. 615-744. In: C. T. Hackney, S. M. Adams, and W. H. Martin (eds.). Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: Aquatic communities. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
6. Davis, R. B. and R. F. Van Dolah (eds.). 1992. Characterization of the physical, chemical, and biological conditions and trends in three South Carolina estuaries 1970-1985. Vol. I. Charleston Harbor estuary. South Carolina Seagrant Consortium, Charleston, SC.
7. Dawes, C. J. 1998. Marine Botany. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
8. Dillon, C. R. and J. H. Rodgers. 1980. Thermal effects on primary productivity of phytoplankton, periphyton, and macrophytes in Lake Keowee, SC. Water Resources Research Institute. Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
9. Doering, P. H., C. A. Oviatt, L. L. Beatty, V. F. Banzon, R. Rice, S. P. Kelly, B. K. Sullivan, and J. B. Frithsen. 1989. Structure and function in a model coastal ecosystem: Silicon, the benthos, and eutrophication. Marine Ecology Progress Series 52:287-299.
10. Dunstan, W. M., L. P. Atkinson, and J. Natoli. 1975. Stimulation and inhibition of phytoplankton growth by low molecular weight hydrocarbons. Marine Biology 31:305-310.
11. Goldman, J. C. and H. I. Stanley. 1974. Relative growth of different species of marine algal in wastewater-seawater mixtures. Marine Biology 28:17-25.
12. Goldman, J. C. 1977. Temperature effects on phytoplankton growth in continuous culture. Limnology and Oceanography 22:932-935.
13. Goldstein, A. K. and J. J. Manzi. 1976. Additions to the freshwater algae of South Carolina. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 92:9-13.
14. Grant, R. R. Jr. 1974. Algae. p. 16-30. In: Cooper River survey 1973 for the E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company. Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia, PA.
15. Gray, J. S. 1982. Effects of pollutants on marine ecosystems. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16:424-443.
16. Greve, W. and T. R. Parsons. 1977. Photosynthesis and fish production: Hypothetical effects of climatic change and pollution. Helgolander Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 30:666-672.
17. Harris, G. P. 1986. Phytoplankton ecology: Structure, function, and fluctuation. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
18. Ianora, A., S. A. Poulet, A. Miralto. 1995. A comparative study of the inhibitory effect of diatoms on the reproductive biology of the copepod Temora stylifera. Marine Biology 121:533-539.
19. Kilham, S. S. and P. Kilham. 1984. The importance of resource supply rates in determining phytoplankton community structure. In: D. G. Meyers and J. R. Strickler (eds.). Trophic Interactions Within Aquatic Ecosystems. Westview Press Inc., Boulder, CO.
20. Legendre, L. 1981. Hydrodynamic control of marine phytoplankton production: The paradox of stability. p. 191-207. In: J. C. J. Nihoul (ed.). Ecohydrodynamics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
21. Lewitus, A. J., R. V. Jesien, T. M. Kana, J. M. Burkholder, H. B. Glasgow, and E. May. 1995. Discovery of the phantom dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 18:373-378.
22. Lewitus, A. J., E. T. Koepfler, and J. T. Morris. 1998. Seasonal variation in the regulation of phytoplankton by nitrogen and grazing in a salt-marsh estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 43(4):636- 646.
23. Mahoney, J. B. and J. J. A. McLaughlin. 1977. The association of phytoflagellates in lower New York Bay with hypereutrophication. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 28:53-65.
24. Molley, M., J. Lennon, N. Drawas, and P. Herbst. 1976. Cross Florida Barge Canal restudy report: Benthic macroinvertebrate and plankton communities of the associated aquatic systems for the proposed Cross Florida Barge Canal. Environmental Research and Technology, Inc. Prepared for: Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville, FL.
25. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1996. Estuarine Eutrophication Survey. Vol. 1. South Atlantic Region. Office of Ocean Resources Conservation Assessment, Silver Spring, MD.
26. Officer, C. B. and J. H. Ryther. 1980. The possible importance of silicon in marine eutrophication. Marine Ecology Progress Series 3:83-91.
27. Ryther, J. H. 1954. The ecology of phytoplankton blooms in Moriches Bay and Great South Bay, Long Island, New York. Biological Bulletin 106:198-209.
28. Ryther, J. H. and C. B. Officer. 1981. Impact of nutrient enrichment on water uses. In: B. J. Neilson and L. E. Cronin (eds.). Estuaries and Nutrients. Humana Press, Clifton, NJ.
29. Sanders, J. G., S. J. Cibik, C. F. D'Elia, and W. R. Boynton. 1987. Nutrient enrichment studies in a coastal plain estuary: changes in phytoplankton species composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 83-90.
30. Sandifer P. A., J. V. Miglarese, D. R. Calder, J. J. Manzi, and L. A. Barclay. 1980. Ecological characterization of the sea island coastal region of South Carolina and Georgia. Vol. III: Biological features of the characterization area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-79/42.
31. Schelske, C. L. and E. F. Stoermer. 1971. Eutrophication, silica depletion, and predicted changes in algal quality in Lake Michigan. Science 173:423-424.
32. Schelske, C. L. and E. F. Stoermer. 1972. Phosphorus, silica and eutrophication in Lake Michigan. In: G. E. Likens (ed.). Nutrients and eutrophication. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Lawrence, KS.
33. Smayda, T. J. 1983. The phytoplankton of estuaries. In: B. H. Ketchum (ed.). Estuaries and enclosed seas. Elsevier, New York, NY.
34. Smayda, T. J. 1989. Primary production and the global epidemic of phytoplankton blooms in the sea: A linkage? In: E. M. Cosper, V. M. Bricelj, and E. J. Carpenter (eds.). Novel phytoplankton blooms. Coastal and Estuarine Studies No. 35. Springer, New York, NY.
35. Tilman, D. 1977. Resource competition between planktonic algae: An experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology 58:338-348.
36. Verity, P. G. 1998. Phytoplankton of the South Atlantic Bight. Draft report submitted to LUCES-South Carolina Seagrant Consortium. Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, Skidaway, GA.
37.Verity, P. G. and G. A. Paffenhšfer. 1996. On assessment of prey ingestion by copepods. Journal of Plankton Research 18:1767-1779.
38. Verity, P. G., J. A. Yoder, J. S. Bishop, J. R. Nelson, D. B. Craven, J. O. Blandon, C. Y. Robertson, and C. R. Tronzo. 1993. Composition, productivity, and nutrient chemistry of a coastal ocean planktonic food web. Continental Shelf Research 13:741-776.
39. Windom, H. L., J. O. Blanton, P. G. Verity, and R. Jahnke. 1993. Oceanographic response to environmental change in ocean processes: U.S. southeast continental shelf. A Summary of Research Conducted in the South Atlantic Bight Under the Auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy From 1977 to 1991. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN.
40. Yentsch, C. S. 1981. Vertical mixing, a constraint to primary production: An extension of the concept of an optimal mixing zone. p. 67-78. In: J. C. J. Nihoul (ed.). Ecohydrodynamics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
41. Zingmark, R. G. 1975. The phytoplankton of Kiawah Island. In: W. M. Campbell, J.M. Dean and W.D. Chamberlain (eds.). Environmental inventory of Kiawah Island. Prepared for Coastal Shores Inc. Environmental Research Center, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina.